Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alliance A061202: Ixazomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma in first relapse.
Voorhees, Peter M; Suman, Vera; Efebera, Yvonne A; Raje, Noopur; Tuchman, Sascha A; Rodriguez, Cesar; Laubach, Jacob P; Bova-Solem, Misty; Carlisle, Destin; Usmani, Saad Z; McCarthy, Philip L; Richardson, Paul G.
  • Voorhees PM; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
  • Suman V; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, United States.
  • Efebera YA; OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
  • Raje N; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Tuchman SA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
  • Rodriguez C; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
  • Laubach JP; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Bova-Solem M; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, United States.
  • Carlisle D; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
  • Usmani SZ; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
  • McCarthy PL; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States.
  • Richardson PG; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Blood Adv ; 2024 Jul 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058954
ABSTRACT
Optimal therapy for the growing number of patients with lenalidomide (LEN)-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in first relapse remains poorly defined. We therefore undertook a randomized phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combining the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (IXA) with pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) for this patient population. The overall response rate (ORR) for POM-DEX was 43.6% and 63.2% for IXA-POM-DEX. Depth of response, as measured by attainment of a very good partial response or better favored the triplet over the doublet, 28.9% vs 5.1%, respectively (p = 0.0063). A pre-planned interim analysis after 75% of the progression events had occurred demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) advantage favoring IXA-POM-DEX that crossed the predefined boundary of superiority, leading to release of the study results. With additional follow-up, the median PFS for POM-DEX was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8 - 13.6 months) vs 20.3 months for IXA-POM-DEX (95% CI 7.7 - 26.0 months, hazard ratio 0.437 [upper 90% bound = 0.657]). ORR and median PFS for the 26 of 30 eligible patients who crossed over from the doublet to the triplet at progression was 23.1% and 5.6 months, respectively. Overall survival was similar between the two groups. More hematologic toxicities were seen with the triplet, but non-hematologic adverse events were similar between the two arms. Our data support further testing of this all-oral triplet vs current standard triplet therapy in the context of phase III studies for patients with LEN-refractory disease in first relapse. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02004275.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article