Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High Rates of Early Septic Failure, but Low Rates of Aseptic Loosening After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.
Bornes, Troy D; Puri, Simarjeet; Neitzke, Colin C; Chandi, Sonia K; Gausden, Elizabeth B; Sculco, Peter K; Chalmers, Brian P.
  • Bornes TD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Puri S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Neitzke CC; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Chandi SK; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Gausden EB; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Sculco PK; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Chalmers BP; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty ; 2024 Aug 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147074
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship and functional outcomes for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with contemporary rotating-hinge knee implants.

METHODS:

A retrospective review identified 115 rTKAs using contemporary rotating-hinge implants from 2014 to 2018 for the treatment of instability (34, 30%), reimplantation after periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (33, 29%), aseptic loosening (25, 22%), arthrofibrosis (14, 12%), periprosthetic fracture (4, 3%), osteolysis (4, 3%), and femoral component fracture (1, 1%). There were 70 women (61%), and the mean age was 67 years (range, 27 to 94). The mean follow-up was 3 years (range, 2 to 6). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models estimated survivorship.

RESULTS:

The re-revision rate was 20% (23 of 115) at an average of 18 months postoperatively. Re-revision indications included PJI (n = 14), aseptic loosening (n = 4), arthrofibrosis (n = 2), instability/malalignment (n = 1), femoral stem fracture (n = 1), and hinge mechanism disruption (n = 1). At 2 and 5 years, survivorship free from all-cause re-revision was 86 and 64%, and survivorship free from re-revision for aseptic loosening was 100 and 87%, respectively. Use of a rotating-hinge implant in reimplantation after PJI was a risk factor for subsequent re-revision (hazard ratio = 2.4, P = 0.046). On a radiographic review of unrevised rotating-hinges, there were major radiolucent lines around 2 femoral and 5 tibial components. The mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement increased from 43 preoperatively to 60 at 1 year (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients treated with a rotating-hinge implant for rTKA, there were relatively poor 2-year (86%) and 5-year (64%) survivorship free from all-cause re-revision, most commonly due to PJI. Midterm survivorship free from re-revision for aseptic loosening was modest (87%). There should be a goal to mitigate complications in complex rTKAs with rotating-hinge implants, namely PJI.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article