Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"I feel like I'm being talked to like an equal": Diabetes language matters to adults with diabetes, a mixed-methods study.
Litterbach, Eloise; Holmes-Truscott, Elizabeth; Gray, Shikha; Halliday, Jennifer; Scibilia, Renza; Skinner, Timothy; Speight, Jane.
  • Litterbach E; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Holmes-Truscott E; The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gray S; Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Halliday J; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Scibilia R; The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Skinner T; Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Speight J; Australian Centre for Accelerating Diabetes Innovations, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Diabet Med ; : e15424, 2024 Aug 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39150048
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To explore reactions to and preferences for words/phrases used in communications about diabetes among adults with diabetes and parents of children with diabetes.

METHODS:

Eligible adults (aged 18+ years) living with diabetes, or parenting a child with diabetes, were recruited via social media to complete an online cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey. Study-specific items were used to examine 22 commonly used diabetes words/phrases in terms of participants' cognitive perceptions ('helpful', 'respectful', 'accurate', 'harmful', 'judgmental' and 'inaccurate') and emotional reactions ('optimistic', 'motivated', 'supported', 'understood', 'offended', 'blamed', 'distressed' and 'angry'). Open-ended questions invited further feedback on (non-)preferred language and its impact(s). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Participants (N = 865) included adults with diabetes (type 1 n = 519; type 2 n = 180, other types n = 48) and parents of children with diabetes (n = 118). Words/phrases most commonly associated with negative perceptions/emotional responses were 'non-compliant' (60% judgmental; 47% felt blamed) and '…good/bad' (54% judgmental; 43% blamed). Positive perceptions were reported for 'managing diabetes' (73% helpful, 47% felt understood), 'person with diabetes' (72% respectful; 49% understood), '…within/outside target range' (60% helpful, 44% understood), and 'condition' (58% respectful; 43% understood). Participants' qualitative responses illuminated perceptions, experiences and impacts across five themes (1) accuracy and simplicity; (2) identity; (3) blame, judgement and stigma; (4) respect and trust and; (5) support, hope and feeling understood. Themes were consistent across diabetes types.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings provide novel evidence into (non-)preferred, and potential (negative and positive) impacts of, commonly used diabetes words/phrases, supporting the international #LanguageMatters movement.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article