Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-analysis of variance in tDCS effects on response inhibition.
Lasogga, Luca; Gramegna, Chiara; Müller, Dario; Habel, Ute; Mehler, David M A; Gur, Ruben C; Weidler, Carmen.
  • Lasogga L; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. llasogga@ukaachen.de.
  • Gramegna C; , Office 117, Wendlingweg 2, 52074, Aachen, Germany. llasogga@ukaachen.de.
  • Müller D; PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
  • Habel U; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
  • Mehler DMA; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
  • Gur RC; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, JARA-Institute Brain Structure Function Relationship (INM 10), Research Center Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52438, Jülich, Germany.
  • Weidler C; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 19197, 2024 08 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160262
ABSTRACT
Deficiencies in response inhibition are associated with numerous mental health conditions, warranting innovative treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, modulates cortical excitability and has shown promise in improving response inhibition. However, tDCS effects on response inhibition often yield contradictory findings. Previous research emphasized the importance of inter-individual factors that are mostly ignored in conventional meta-analyses of mean effects. We aimed to fill this gap and promote the complementary use of the coefficient of variation ratio and standardized mean effects. The systematic literature search included single-session and sham-controlled tDCS studies utilizing stop-signal task or Go-NoGo tasks, analyzing 88 effect sizes from 53 studies. Considering the impact of inter-individual factors, we hypothesized that variances increase in the active versus sham tDCS. However, the results showed that variances between both groups did not differ. Additionally, analyzing standardized mean effects supported previous research showing an improvement in the stop-signal task but not in the Go-NoGo task following active tDCS. These findings suggest that inter-individual differences do not increase variances in response inhibition, implying that the heterogeneity cannot be attributed to higher variance in response inhibition during and after active tDCS. Furthermore, methodological considerations are crucial for tDCS efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa / Inhibición Psicológica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa / Inhibición Psicológica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article