Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter experience with a pectoral unipolar implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Active Can Investigators.
Bardy, G H; Yee, R; Jung, W.
  • Bardy GH; University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 28(2): 400-10, 1996 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8800117
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine in a multicenter study the methods of use, efficacy and complications of a unipolar cardioverter-defibrillator in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death.

BACKGROUND:

Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators in the pectoral region offers a significant opportunity to improve the management of patients with life-threatening arrhythmias. Unipolar, single-lead, pectoral implantable cardioverter-defibrillators might decrease related mortality, morbidity and costs in the care of such patients.

METHODS:

From November 3, 1993 to May 8, 1995, a unipolar defibrillator (Medtronic model 7219C) was selected for use in 473 patients from 74 centers (386 [82%] men, 87 [18%] women; mean [+/- SD] age 59 +/- 13 years, range 16 to 88). The clinical indication for use was ventricular fibrillation in 157 patients, sustained ventricular tachycardia in 236, both ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in 53 and syncope or inducible ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in 27. Coronary artery disease was present in 323 patients (68%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.36 +/- 0.15 (range 0.10 to 0.85). The distribution of New York Heart Association congestive heart failure was class I = 34%; class II = 45%; class III = 17%; and class IV = 2%.

RESULTS:

The unipolar cardioverter-defibrillator was inserted successfully in 464 (98%) of 473 candidates. Effective defibrillation occurred with the first shock polarity tested in 88% of patients, after a polarity switch in 8% and after lead or generator repositioning in 2%. The stored energy defibrillation threshold was obtained at implantation in 339 patients (72%) and was 11.5 +/- 6.1 J, with 72% of patients having a defibrillation threshold < or = 12 J. The mean "skin-to-skin" implantation time was 96 +/- 45 min (range 25 to 335 min). Complications occurred in 29 patients (6%). Device therapy for 2,160 spontaneous ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation episodes occurred in 128 patients (27%) over a 2,732 device-month experience (range 0 to 17.2) and was effective in 98.7% of episodes. There were 14 deaths (10 nonsudden cardiac, 3 sudden cardiac, 1 noncardiac). Cumulative survival, on an intention-to-treat basis from all causes of death at 17.2 months, was 94.4%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Unipolar pectoral implantable cardioverter-defibrillators can be inserted with a high likelihood of success in a relatively brief procedure. Defibrillation thresholds are low, morbidity is modest, and survival rates are good with this new type of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Asunto(s)
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Ventricular / Taquicardia Ventricular / Desfibriladores Implantables Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 1996 Tipo del documento: Article
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Ventricular / Taquicardia Ventricular / Desfibriladores Implantables Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 1996 Tipo del documento: Article