Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term outcomes of spinal SBRT. Is it important to select the treatment time?
Pérez-Montero, Héctor; Godino Martinez, Óscar; Lozano, Alicia; Asiáin Azcárate, Leyre; Martínez, Irene; Sánchez, Juan José; De Blas Piñol, Rodolfo; Fernandez Mariscal, Esmeralda; Stefanovic, Milica; Garcia, Nagore.
Afiliação
  • Pérez-Montero, Héctor; Institut Català D’Oncologia. Barcelona. Spain
  • Godino Martinez, Óscar; Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Barcelona. Spain
  • Lozano, Alicia; Institut Català D’Oncologia. Barcelona. Spain
  • Asiáin Azcárate, Leyre; Institut Català D’Oncologia. Barcelona. Spain
  • Martínez, Irene; Institut Català D’Oncologia. Barcelona. Spain
  • Sánchez, Juan José; Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Barcelona. Spain
  • De Blas Piñol, Rodolfo; Institut Català D’Oncologia. Barcelona. Spain
  • Fernandez Mariscal, Esmeralda; Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Barcelona. Spain
  • Stefanovic, Milica; Institut Català D’Oncologia. Barcelona. Spain
  • Garcia, Nagore; Institut Català D’Oncologia. Barcelona. Spain
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 24(2): 276-287, febrero 2022.
Article em En | IBECS | ID: ibc-203433
Biblioteca responsável: ES1.1
Localização: ES15.1 - BNCS
ABSTRACT
PurposeSBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) is widely used as a curative treatment in tumoral lesions and has become a fundamental tool for the treatment of spine metastasis. In this study, we present survival and toxicity outcomes of spine SBRT after a 2-year follow-up.Methods/patientsData from spine SBRT treatments performed at our institution between March 2012 and February 2020 was collected. Medical records, including demographic, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics were reviewed. Patient follow-up included clinical evaluation, imaging, and blood tests. Toxicity was recorded according to CTCAE v4.0.ResultsWe analyzed 73 consecutive spine SBRT treatments in 60 patients. 39.7% of the cases had primary breast cancer and 23.3% had prostate cancer. Most cases (87.7%) were treated with a single SBRT fraction of 16 Gy. Median follow-up was 26.1 months (range 1.7–78.6), and 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.9% and 84.2%, respectively. Local control (LC) rates at 1- and 2-years were 76.3% and 70.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified histology as a prognostic factor for both OS and LC. Patients who underwent spine SBRT 6 months after the spinal lesion diagnosis had LC at 2 years of 88%, vs 61.7% for those who underwent SBRT before this period. No grade III or higher toxicity was reported. The vertebral compression fracture (VCF) rate was 4.1%.ConclusionSpine SBRT at our institution showed a 2-year LC of 70.6%, without G3 toxicities. Delaying SBRT at least 6 months to administer systemic treatment was related to an improvement in local control.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Coluna Vertebral / Ciências da Saúde / Metástase Neoplásica / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: IBECS Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Coluna Vertebral / Ciências da Saúde / Metástase Neoplásica / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article