Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of radiotherapy dose and other treatment-related and clinical factors on in-field control in stage I and II non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Kamath, S S; Marcus, R B; Lynch, J W; Mendenhall, N P.
Afiliação
  • Kamath SS; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 44(3): 563-8, 1999 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10348285
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE/

OBJECTIVE:

To assess local (in-field) disease control, identify potential prognostic factors, and elucidate the optimal radiotherapy dose in various clinical settings of Stage I and II non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (non-CNS). MATERIALS &

METHODS:

A total of 285 consecutive patients with Stage I and II non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with curative intent, including 159 with radiotherapy (RT) alone and 126 with combined-modality therapy (CMT). Of these, 72 patients had low-grade lymphomas (LGL), 92 had intermediate or high-grade lymphomas (I/HGL), and 21 had unclassified lymphomas. Clinical and treatment variables with potential prognostic significance for in-field disease control, freedom from relapse (FFR), and absolute survival (AS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS:

The 5-, 10-, and 20-year actuarial AS rates were 73%, 46%, and 33% for patients with LGL and 64%, 44%, and 18% for patients with I/HGL, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 20-year actuarial FFR rates were 62%, 59%, and 49% for patients with LGL and 66%, 57%, and 57% for patients with I/HGL, respectively. Significant prognostic factors identified by the multivariate analysis were age, tumor size, and histology for AS; tumor size and treatment for FFR; and only tumor size for in-field disease control. There were 95 total failures, with only 12 occurring infield. Most failures (65%) were in contiguous unirradiated sites. All 4 in-field failures in patients with LGL occurred after RT doses < 30 Gy, although none occurred in 10 patients with small-volume LGL of the orbit treated with doses < 30 Gy. The 8 in-field failures in patients with I/HGL were distributed evenly throughout the RT dose range; 5 occurred in patients treated with CMT, all with tumors > 6 cm, and 4 with less than a complete response (CR) to chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION:

Our analysis suggests that the overwhelming problem in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is not in-field failure but, rather, failure in contiguous unirradiated sites. A dose of 20-25 Gy may be sufficient for small-volume LGL of the orbit. A dose of 30 Gy is sufficient for LGL in general, as well as for patients with nonbulky (< or = 6 cm) I/HGL treated with CMT who have a CR. However, patients with I/HGL treated with CMT for tumors > 6 cm and/or without a CR may benefit from doses > or = 40 Gy.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 1999 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 1999 Tipo de documento: Article