Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase III study of N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl) phenoxy]ethanamine (BMS-217380-01) combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA.19.
Reyno, Leonard; Seymour, Lesley; Tu, Dongsheng; Dent, Susan; Gelmon, Karen; Walley, Barbara; Pluzanska, Anna; Gorbunova, Vera; Garin, Avgust; Jassem, Jacek; Pienkowski, Tadeusz; Dancey, Janet; Pearce, Laura; MacNeil, Mary; Marlin, Susan; Lebwohl, David; Voi, Maurizio; Pritchard, Kathleen.
Afiliação
  • Reyno L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, Cancer Research Institute, Queens University, 10 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L3N6.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(2): 269-76, 2004 Jan 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14722035
PURPOSE: N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine (DPPE; tesmilifene) is a novel agent that augments chemotherapy cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. A phase II trial combining DPPE and doxorubicin (DOX) in metastatic breast carcinoma showed increased response over that expected with DOX. We report a phase III trial comparing DOX with DPPE plus DOX in metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anthracycline-naive women with measurable metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive, every 21 days, either DOX 60 mg/m(2) intravenously or DOX during the last 20 minutes of an 80-minute infusion of DPPE (5.3 mg/kg), in both cases to cumulative DOX doses of 450 mg/m(2). Patients receiving DPPE were aggressively premedicated to ameliorate toxicity. End points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and response duration (RD), quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A planned interim analysis failed to detect an RR difference more than 5%. The study was closed to additional accrual and all DPPE was discontinued. The final analysis was conducted as planned after 256 progression events (median follow-up, 20.5 months). There was no significant difference in RR, RD, or PFS between arms. DPPE plus DOX was statistically superior to DOX in OS (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; P =.021). DPPE plus DOX was associated with more gastrointestinal and CNS toxicity. No consistent influence on QOL was detected. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no advantage in RR, RD, or PFS but significantly superior OS for DPPE plus DOX. Additional studies of DPPE are warranted.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Éteres Fenílicos / Neoplasias da Mama / Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Doxorrubicina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2004 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Éteres Fenílicos / Neoplasias da Mama / Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Doxorrubicina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2004 Tipo de documento: Article