Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimating direct and indirect costs of premenstrual syndrome.
Borenstein, Jeff; Chiou, Chiun-Fang; Dean, Bonnie; Wong, John; Wade, Sally.
Afiliação
  • Borenstein J; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Occup Environ Med ; 47(1): 26-33, 2005 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15643156
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the economic impact of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) on the employer. METHODS: Data were collected from 374 women aged 18-45 with regular menses. Direct costs were quantified using administrative claims of these patients and the Medicare Fee Schedule. Indirect costs were quantified by both self-reported days of work missed and lost productivity at work. Regression analyses were used to develop a model to project PMS-related direct and indirect costs. RESULTS: A total of 29.6% (n = 111) of the participants were diagnosed with PMS. A PMS diagnosis was associated with an average annual increase of $59 in direct costs (P < 0.026) and $4333 in indirect costs per patient (P < 0.0001) compared with patients without PMS. CONCLUSIONS: A PMS diagnosis correlated with a modest increase in direct medical costs and a large increase in indirect costs.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome Pré-Menstrual / Absenteísmo / Doenças Profissionais Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome Pré-Menstrual / Absenteísmo / Doenças Profissionais Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article