Estimating direct and indirect costs of premenstrual syndrome.
J Occup Environ Med
; 47(1): 26-33, 2005 Jan.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-15643156
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the economic impact of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) on the employer. METHODS: Data were collected from 374 women aged 18-45 with regular menses. Direct costs were quantified using administrative claims of these patients and the Medicare Fee Schedule. Indirect costs were quantified by both self-reported days of work missed and lost productivity at work. Regression analyses were used to develop a model to project PMS-related direct and indirect costs. RESULTS: A total of 29.6% (n = 111) of the participants were diagnosed with PMS. A PMS diagnosis was associated with an average annual increase of $59 in direct costs (P < 0.026) and $4333 in indirect costs per patient (P < 0.0001) compared with patients without PMS. CONCLUSIONS: A PMS diagnosis correlated with a modest increase in direct medical costs and a large increase in indirect costs.
Buscar no Google
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Síndrome Pré-Menstrual
/
Absenteísmo
/
Doenças Profissionais
Tipo de estudo:
Health_economic_evaluation
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
País como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2005
Tipo de documento:
Article