Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Echo-Doppler and clinical evaluations to define hemodynamic profile in patients with chronic heart failure: accuracy and influence on therapeutic management.
Capomolla, Soccorso; Ceresa, Monica; Pinna, GianDomenico; Maestri, Roberto; La Rovere, Maria Teresa; Febo, Oreste; Rossi, Angelo; Paganini, Vincenzo; Caporotondi, Angelo; Guazzotti, Giampaolo; Gnemmi, Marco; Mortara, Andrea; Cobelli, Franco.
Afiliação
  • Capomolla S; Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, IRCCS, -PAVIA-Istituto Scientifico di Montescano, Italy. scapomolla@fsm.it
Eur J Heart Fail ; 7(4): 624-30, 2005 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15921804
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Correct classification of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients by dual evidence of congestion and adequate perfusion is the primary clinical focus for management.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the accuracy of echo-Doppler compared with clinical evaluation in determining the hemodynamic profile of patients with CHF; and to compare therapeutic changes based on hemodynamic or echo-Doppler findings.

METHODS:

Three hundred and sixty-six consecutive CHF patients (ejection fraction 25+/-7%) in sinus rhythm, undergoing evaluation for cardiac transplantation, underwent physical examination prior to right heart catheterization and echo-Doppler studies. Subsequently, patients were randomized to therapeutic optimization using either right heart catheterization or echo-Doppler data. The end-points were identification of low cardiac output (cardiac index <2.2 l/min/m(2)); high pulmonary wedge pressure (PWP >18 mm Hg); high right atrial pressure (RAP >5 mm Hg) and analysis of therapeutic changes made in response to the right heart catheterization and echo-Doppler studies.

RESULTS:

Echo-Doppler showed better accuracy in estimating abnormal hemodynamic indices than clinical variables (cardiac index <2.2 l/min/m(2) echo positive predictive accuracy (PPA) 98% vs. clinical PPA 52% p<0.00001; PWP >18 mm Hg echo PPA 85% vs. clinical PPA 76% p=0.0011; RAP >5 mm Hg echo PPA 82% vs. clinical PPA 57% p<0.00001). When applied to individual patients, the echo-Doppler assessment was more accurate than clinical evaluation in defining the different hemodynamic profiles wet/cold (89% vs. 13%, p<0.0001); wet/warm (73% vs. 30%, p<0.0001); dry/cold (68% vs. 12%, p<0.0001); dry/warm (88% vs. 51%, p<0.0001). Therapeutic decision-making based on echo-Doppler findings was similar to that based on hemodynamics.

CONCLUSION:

Echo-Doppler hemodynamic monitoring proved accurate in estimating hemodynamic profiles and influenced therapeutic management.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article