[Ex post opinion on work disability in a payment decision case]. / Opiniowanie ex post o niezdolnosci do pracy dla celów rentowych.
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol
; 55(4): 301-3, 2005.
Article
em Pl
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-16498974
ABSTRACT
This paper describes a case of ex post opinion in the judgement of work disability for purposes of benefit qualification, in which numerous, frequently contradictory disability certifications by KIZ, WKIZ, ZUS physician-certifiers and court medical opinions were issued. Despite the simplicity of her case, a woman underwent 17 examinations in connection with the opinions and certifications. The court, instead of verifying the opinions and clearing up all doubts through questioning legal experts, submitted subsequent opinions as evidence, and ZUS broke the law by issuing work certification in spite of a legally binding court ruling.
Buscar no Google
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Avaliação da Capacidade de Trabalho
/
Pessoas com Deficiência
/
Definição da Elegibilidade
/
Prova Pericial
Limite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
País como assunto:
Europa
Idioma:
Pl
Ano de publicação:
2005
Tipo de documento:
Article