Importing measured field fluences into the treatment planning system to validate a breathing synchronized DMLC-IMRT irradiation technique.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recalculating dose distributions using measured IMRT fluence fields imported into the treatment planning system (TPS) to evaluate the technical feasibility of a prototype developed for breathing synchronized irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DMLC-IMRT fluence patterns acquired on radiographic film, generated by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, have been imported into the TPS. The effect of dose blurring and possible interplay between organ motion and leaf motion, and the efficacy of a breathing synchronized irradiation technique (an adapted version of a commercially available image-guidance system NOVALIS BODY/ExacTrac4.0, BrainLAB AG) have been evaluated using radiographic film mounted to a simple phantom simulating a breathing pattern of 16 cycles per minute and covering a distance of 4 cm to obtain the resulting fluence maps. Two situations have been investigated to illustrate this principle (a) a tumor located close to the diaphragm to assess the influence of organ motion on the dose to the target volume as well as to the gastro-intestinal tract that presents a high risk at intersecting with the beam during the breathing cycle. (b) A mediastinal lesion requiring complicated fluence patterns. RESULTS: Importing measured fluence maps yielded highly disturbed reconstructed dose distributions in case of the non-gated delivery with the phantom in motion (both orthogonal and parallel to the leaf direction), whereas the measurements from the static (film fixed in space) and the gated delivery showed good agreement with the original theoretical dose distribution. These findings have been confirmed by the dose-volume histograms, corresponding tumor control probabilities, conformity index and dose heterogeneity values. The normal tissue complication probabilities investigated in this study seem to be affected to a lesser degree, which concurs with the observation that the motion effects result in a dose spread in the direction of motion. The applied breathing synchronization technique introduced an increased treatment time with a factor 3-4. CONCLUSIONS: The use of measured fluence fields, delivered by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, as imported fluence maps for the treatment planning system is an interesting quality assurance tool and revealed the dramatic impact of dose blurring and interplay between DMLC-IMRT dose delivery and organ motion, as well as the potential of breathing synchronization to resolve this issue. The possible advantage of breathing synchronized irradiation is compromised with an increased treatment time.