Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Urea distribution volume calculated by ionic dialysance]. / Cálculo del volumen de distribución de la urea mediante dialisancia iónica.
Teruel, J L; Merino, J L; Fernández-Lucas, M; Tenorio, M T; Rivera, M; Marcén, R; Ortuño, J.
Afiliação
  • Teruel JL; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid.
Nefrologia ; 26(1): 121-7, 2006.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16649433
BACKGROUND: Direct dialysis quantification is considered the gold standard for determining urea distribution volume, but it is impractical for routine use. So, urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients is usually estimated from anthropometric equations. Ionic dialysance allows to calculate the urea distribution volume dividing the Kt obtained by ionic dialysance by the Kt/V obtained by a simplified formula. The aim of the present work was to analyse the concordance between the ionic dialysance and the direct dialysis quantification methods to estimate de urea distribution volume. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 15 hemodialysis patients (10 males and 5 females), we have estimated the urea distribution volume by the direct dialysis quantification (Vurea), by the anthropometrics equations of Watson (VWatson) and Chertow (VChertow) and by the ionic dialysance method (VDI). To obtain VDI we have used two simplified Kt/V formulas: the monocompartimental and the equilibrated Daugirdas equations (VDIm and VDIe respectively). The intermethod variability was assessed by the relative difference (absolute difference between VUrea and the other methods, divided by the mean). RESULTS: VUrea (26,2 L) was statistically different from theVDIe (30,6 L, p < 0.01), VWatson 35.2 L (p < 0.001) and VChertow (38 L, p < 0.001). VDIm was 26.3 L (p = ns). VUrea represents the 42% of the body weight for the males (range 36 to 49%) and the 33% of the body weight for the female (range 28 to 38%). The intermethod variability was high for the VDIe (21.6%), VWatson (37.4%) and VChertow (48. 1%), but it was low for the VDIm (9.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Urea distribution volume calculated by the ionic dialysance method using the monocompartimental Daugirdas Kt/V equation has an acceptable agreement with the urea distribution volume calculated by the direct dialysis quantification. Anthropometry-based equations overestimate the urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureia / Compartimentos de Líquidos Corporais / Diálise Renal / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureia / Compartimentos de Líquidos Corporais / Diálise Renal / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article