Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical characterization of familial isolated pituitary adenomas.
Daly, A F; Jaffrain-Rea, M-L; Ciccarelli, A; Valdes-Socin, H; Rohmer, V; Tamburrano, G; Borson-Chazot, C; Estour, B; Ciccarelli, E; Brue, T; Ferolla, P; Emy, P; Colao, A; De Menis, E; Lecomte, P; Penfornis, F; Delemer, B; Bertherat, J; Wémeau, J L; De Herder, W; Archambeaud, F; Stevenaert, A; Calender, A; Murat, A; Cavagnini, F; Beckers, A.
Afiliação
  • Daly AF; Department of Endocrinology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 91(9): 3316-23, 2006 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16787992
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Familial pituitary adenomas occur rarely in the absence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and Carney complex (CNC).

OBJECTIVE:

Our objective was to characterize the clinical and genealogical features of non-MEN1/CNC familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). DESIGN AND

SETTING:

We conducted a retrospective study of clinical and genealogical characteristics of FIPA cases and performed a comparison with a sporadic population at 22 university hospitals in Belgium, Italy, France, and The Netherlands.

RESULTS:

Sixty-four FIPA families including 138 affected individuals were identified [55 prolactinomas, 47 somatotropinomas, 28 nonsecreting adenomas (NS), and eight ACTH-secreting tumors]. Cases were MEN1/PRKAR1A-mutation negative. First-degree relationships predominated (75.6%) among affected individuals. A single tumor phenotype occurred in 30 families (homogeneous), and heterogeneous phenotypes occurred in 34 families. FIPA cases were younger at diagnosis than sporadic cases (P = 0.015); tumors were diagnosed earlier in the first vs. the second generation of multigenerational families. Macroadenomas were more frequent in heterogeneous vs. homogeneous FIPA families (P = 0.036). Prolactinomas from heterogeneous families were larger and had more frequent suprasellar extension (P = 0.004) than sporadic cases. Somatotropinomas occurred as isolated familial somatotropinoma cases and within heterogeneous FIPA families; isolated familial somatotropinoma cases represented 18% of FIPA cases and were younger at diagnosis than patients with sporadic somatotropinomas. Familial NS cases were younger at diagnosis (P = 0.03) and had more frequently invasive tumors (P = 0.024) than sporadic cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Homogeneous and heterogeneous expression of prolactinomas, somatotropinomas, NS, and Cushing's disease can occur within families in the absence of MEN1/CNC. FIPA and sporadic cases have differing clinical characteristics. FIPA may represent a novel endocrine neoplasia classification that requires further genetic characterization.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Hipofisárias / Adenoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Hipofisárias / Adenoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2006 Tipo de documento: Article