Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improved survival after introduction of an emergency endovascular therapy protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Moore, Randy; Nutley, Mark; Cina, Claudio S; Motamedi, Mona; Faris, Peter; Abuznadah, Wesam.
Afiliação
  • Moore R; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. randyd.moore@calgaryhealthregion.ca
J Vasc Surg ; 45(3): 443-50, 2007 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17257800
BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to demonstrate improved survival (30-day mortality) after the introduction of an emergency endovascular therapy protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). Numerous authors have successfully demonstrated reduced mortality in patients with rAAA using endovascular techniques. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with open repair for rAAA may be misleading, however, because EVAR cannot be performed on all patients, and selection bias may explain the superior performance of any given surgical or endovascular strategy. We developed a model to predict mortality in patients before the introduction of EVAR (preprotocol population), applied this model to predict 30-day mortality among prospective patients (postprotocol population), and compared observed vs expected results. METHODS: We assessed 126 patients with rAAA. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Potential confounding variables were age, sex, presurgical lowest recorded systolic blood pressure (SBP), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). A logistic regression model incorporating significant confounders was used to evaluate changes in 30-day mortality for all patients with rAAA after introduction of the EVAR protocol. Separate logistic regressions were done to compare 30-day mortality for preprotocol vs patients receiving EVAR and preprotocol vs patients receiving postprotocol open repair. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess shifts in the performance of the rAAA program over time. RESULTS: Significant confounders were SBP, absence of SBP, and GFR. Logistic regression found evidence of lower mortality after the protocol was introduced, 17.9% vs 30.0% (odds ratio [OR], 0.385; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141 to 0.981; P = .046). Comparison of all open repairs (preprotocol and postprotocol) and EVAR demonstrated decreased risk for EVAR of 5.0% vs 28.3% (OR, 0.109; 95% CI, 0.013 to 0.906; P = .0084). Unstable patients (SBP
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ruptura Aórtica / Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ruptura Aórtica / Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article