Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (NRP-104) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, forced-dose, parallel-group study.
Biederman, Joseph; Krishnan, Suma; Zhang, Yuxin; McGough, James J; Findling, Robert L.
Afiliação
  • Biederman J; Department of Pediatric Psychopharmacology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. jbiederman@partners.org
Clin Ther ; 29(3): 450-63, 2007 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17577466
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lisdexamfetamme dimesylate (LDX) is a therapeutically inactive amphetamine prodrug. It was developed with the goal of providing an extended duration of effect that is consistent throughout the day, with a reduced potential for abuse, overdose toxicity, and drug tampering. Following ingestion, the pharmacologically active d-amphetamine molecule is gradually released by rate-limited hydrolysis.

OBJECTIVES:

The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and tolerability of LDX in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treated in the community, and to characterize the duration of action of LDX compared with placebo.

METHODS:

This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, forced-dose, parallel-group study was conducted at 40 centers across the United States. Male and female children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD were randomly assigned to receive LDX 30, 50, or 70 mg with forced-dose titration, or placebo, PO QD for 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV), the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPR'), and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS:

Of the 290 randomized patients (201 boys, 89 girls; mean [SD] age, 9 [1.8] years), 230 completed the trial (LDX 30 mg, n=56; LDX 50 mg, n=60; LDX 70 mg, n=60; and placebo, n=54). The most common reasons for study discontinuation (n=60) were lack of efficacy (LDX 30 mg, 1%; LDX 50 mg, 0%; LDX 70 mg, 1 %; and placebo, 17%) and adverse events (AEs) (LDX 30 mg, 9%; LDX 50 mg, 5%; LDX 70 mg, 14%; and placebo, 1%). Significant improvements in ADHD-RS-IV scores were seen with all doses of LDX compared with placebo (all, P<0.001), and in CPRS scores with all LDX doses versus placebo throughout the day (all, P<0.001 for all comparisons). Efficacy was observed by the first week of treatment, and improvements were observed throughout the day up to approximately 6 PM. The most frequently reported AEs among patients receiving LDX were typical of amphetamine products decreased appetite (39% with active treatment vs 4% with placebo), insomnia (19% vs 3%), upper abdominal pain (12% vs 6%), headache (12% vs 10%), irritability (10% vs 0%), vomiting (9% vs 4%), weight decrease (9% vs 1%), and nausea (6% vs 3%); most were mild to moderate and occurred in the first week.

CONCLUSION:

In this population of children with ADHD, treatment once daily with the prodrug LDX at doses of 30 to 70 mg appeared to be effective and had a tolerability profile similar to those of currently marketed extended-release stimulants.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade / Dextroanfetamina / Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade / Dextroanfetamina / Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article