Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Diagnoses and diagnostic procedures in 500 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of interstitial lung disease]. / Diagnósticos y procedimientos en 500 pacientes consecutivos con sospecha clínica de enfermedad pulmonar intersticial.
Morell, Ferran; Reyes, Leonardo; Doménech, Gema; De Gracia, Javier; Majó, Joaquim; Ferrer, Jaume.
Afiliação
  • Morell F; Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España. fmorell@vhebron.net
Arch Bronconeumol ; 44(4): 185-91, 2008 Apr.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18423179
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the diagnostic yield achieved with the application of current recommendations for evaluating patients with suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the procedures that must be applied to reach a definitive diagnosis. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Over a 10-year period, 500 consecutive patients attending an ILD outpatient clinic who showed features of diffuse lung involvement were assessed with a single diagnostic protocol. Results were introduced in a dedicated database and diagnoses for idiopathic interstitial pneumonia were established according to a recent consensus classification.

RESULTS:

A definitive diagnosis was reached in 427 (85%) patients in 125 without invasive procedures and in 302 with invasive procedures. In 73 (14.6%) cases a definitive diagnosis was not reached, and patients were placed in the group of unclassifiable interstitial pneumonia. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia was the predominant group with 193 (39%) patients. The main specific entities included sarcoidosis with 93 (19%) patients, usual interstitial pneumonia with 84 (17%) patients, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis with 75 (15%) patients. Thirty (6%) patients were diagnosed with an illness other than ILD (false ILD). In 332 patients, we performed a total of 433 invasive procedures transbronchial biopsy in 252 (direct diagnostic yield, 38%, or if used also to exclude other specific diagnosis, 50%), bronchoalveolar lavage in 260 (yield, 5%), and open lung biopsy in 141 (yield, 93%). Hence, following the current diagnostic approach, a definitive diagnosis was established for 85% of patients, for 25% solely on clinical grounds and imaging criteria and for 60% on the basis of invasive procedures. Diagnosis by open lung biopsy was still required for 141 (28%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

The diagnostic yield was high when the recommended study protocol was followed. A quarter of the diagnoses were reached with clinical criteria alone, but another quarter could only be made after open lung biopsy.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Es Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article