Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial.
Sierra, Jorge; Szer, Jeffrey; Kassis, Jeannine; Herrmann, Richard; Lazzarino, Mario; Thomas, Xavier; Noga, Stephen J; Baker, Nigel; Dansey, Roger; Bosi, Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Sierra J; Division of Clinical Hematology, Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. jsierra@santpau.es
BMC Cancer ; 8: 195, 2008 Jul 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18616811
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are often neutropenic as a result of their disease. Furthermore, these patients typically experience profound neutropenia following induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy and this may result in serious, potentially life-threatening, infection. This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 clinical trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim for assisting neutrophil recovery following induction and consolidation chemotherapy for de novo AML in patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics.

METHODS:

Patients (n = 84) received one or two courses of standard induction chemotherapy (idarubicin + cytarabine), followed by one course of consolidation therapy (high-dose cytarabine) if complete remission was achieved. They were randomized to receive either single-dose pegfilgrastim 6 mg or daily filgrastim 5 mug/kg, beginning 24 hours after induction and consolidation chemotherapy.

RESULTS:

The median time to recovery from severe neutropenia was 22.0 days for both pegfilgrastim (n = 42) and filgrastim (n = 41) groups during Induction 1 (difference 0.0 days; 95% CI -1.9 to 1.9). During Consolidation, recovery occurred after a median of 17.0 days for pegfilgrastim versus 16.5 days for filgrastim (difference 0.5 days; 95% CI -1.1 to 2.1). Therapeutic pegfilgrastim serum concentrations were maintained throughout neutropenia. Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of filgrastim.

CONCLUSION:

These data suggest no clinically meaningful difference between a single dose of pegfilgrastim and multiple daily doses of filgrastim for shortening the duration of severe neutropenia following chemotherapy in de novo AML patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00114764.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leucemia Mieloide Aguda / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Neutropenia / Neutrófilos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leucemia Mieloide Aguda / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Neutropenia / Neutrófilos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article