A common contrast pooling rule for suppression within and between the eyes.
Vis Neurosci
; 25(4): 585-601, 2008.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-18764960
ABSTRACT
Recent work has revealed multiple pathways for cross-orientation suppression in cat and human vision. In particular, ipsiocular and interocular pathways appear to assert their influence before binocular summation in human but have different (1) spatial tuning, (2) temporal dependencies, and (3) adaptation after-effects. Here we use mask components that fall outside the excitatory passband of the detecting mechanism to investigate the rules for pooling multiple mask components within these pathways. We measured psychophysical contrast masking functions for vertical 1 cycle/deg sine-wave gratings in the presence of left or right oblique ( 16%. We tested contrast gain control models involving two types of contrast combination on the denominator (1) spatial pooling of the mask after a local nonlinearity (to calculate either root mean square contrast or energy) and (2) (Holmes & Meese, 2004, Journal of Vision 4, 1080-1089), involving the linear sum of the mask component contrasts. Monoptic and dichoptic masking were typically better fit by the spatial pooling models, but binocular masking was not it demanded strict linear summation of the Michelson contrast across mask orientation. Another scheme, in which suppressive pooling followed compressive contrast responses to the mask components (e.g., oriented cortical cells), was ruled out by all of our data. We conclude that the different processes that underlie monoptic and dichoptic masking use the same type of contrast pooling within their respective suppressive fields, but the effects do not sum to predict the binocular case.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Mascaramento Perceptivo
/
Sensibilidades de Contraste
/
Fenômenos Fisiológicos Oculares
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2008
Tipo de documento:
Article