Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emergency nephrectomy due to severe urosepsis: a retrospective, multicentre analysis of 65 cases.
Berger, Ingrid; Wildhofen, Sonja; Lee, Alexander; Ponholzer, Anton; Rauchenwald, Michael; Zechner, Othmar; Stackl, Walter; Madersbacher, Stephan.
Afiliação
  • Berger I; Department of Urology and Andrology, Donauspital, Vienna, Austria.
BJU Int ; 104(3): 386-90, 2009 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19338556
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the outcome of emergency nephrectomy in a retrospective, multicentre analysis, as emergency nephrectomy due to life-threatening urosepsis is a rare clinical scenario with a high mortality, and there are few reports of clinical data on this issue. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We assessed retrospectively all patients who had a nephrectomy due to life-threatening urosepsis in three referral centres in Vienna between 1994 and 2007. Patient characteristics, survival and risk factors for a fatal outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS:

In all 65 patients (44 women and 21 men; mean age 65 years) were analysed. The mean interval from the first medical consultation to hospital admission was 4.3 days. Two-thirds of patients were admitted directly from their homes (63%), the remainder being transferred from other departments or hospitals. The most common pathological mechanism leading to urosepsis was acute pyelonephritis, often combined with nephrolithiasis. In all, 36 patients had a urological intervention before nephrectomy, i.e. percutaneous nephrostomy in 17, ureteric stent in 16 and percutaneous abscess drainage in three. Nephrectomy was performed a mean (range) of 5.7 (0-31) days after hospital admission. Thirteen patients (20%) died from septic multi-organ failure after surgery. This group was almost 20 years older than those who survived (78.6 vs 61.8 years), had a higher comorbidity rate, had undergone endourological interventions more frequently (69% vs 52%), had a longer interval to nephrectomy (6.9 vs 5.4 days), higher C-reactive protein level (294.9 vs 136.0 mg/L) and lower platelet counts (229.5 vs 307.7 million/L) at diagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

Several factors were identified that influence the outcome after emergency nephrectomy for life-threatening urosepsis. Applied to the decision-making process, these risk factors could have a positive impact on establishing a timely indication for nephrectomy that might ultimately reduce the high mortality rate.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Sepse / Nefropatias / Nefrectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Sepse / Nefropatias / Nefrectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article