Does route of hysterectomy affect outcome in obese and nonobese women?

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the surgical outcomes of obese women having hysterectomy according to the route (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) of the procedure. METHODS: A chart review of 293 hysterectomy procedures was performed. Data were collected including operative and anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, change in hematocrit, hospital stay, complications, conversion to laparotomy, transfusion, and body mass index. An analysis of variance and a Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison test were performed. RESULTS: Obese women experienced a significant decrease in hospital days (2.5 versus 4.2) and reported blood loss (204 mL versus 455 mL) in the laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy groups compared with the abdominal hysterectomy group. No significant difference was found in obese women between laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy for time spent in surgery and under anesthesia. For obese and normal weight women, vaginal hysterectomy offered the shortest surgery, anesthesia times, and hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: For normal and obese women, vaginal hysterectomy offered the shortest hospital stay and surgery time. In obese patients for whom vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, laparoscopic hysterectomy should be considered before abdominal hysterectomy, because the laparoscopic route reduced hospital time and blood loss.