Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is an intrauterine device a contraindication for uterine artery embolization? A study of 20 patients.
Smeets, Albert Joseph; Nijenhuis, Robbert J; Boekkooi, Peter F; Vervest, Harry A M; van Rooij, Willem Jan; Lohle, Paul N M.
Afiliação
  • Smeets AJ; Department of Radiology, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, Tilbury 5022GC, the Netherlands. a.smeets@wxs.nl
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 21(2): 272-4, 2010 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20036145
ABSTRACT
The presence of an intrauterine device (IUD) has been traditionally considered a risk factor for postprocedural infection in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization (UAE). The authors retrospectively evaluated the occurrence of infectious complications following embolization in 20 women with IUDs. After a mean follow-up of 20.5 months, none of the patients developed an infectious complication. One patient required hysterectomy following embolization for persistent pain. Pathologic evaluation of the hysterectomy specimen demonstrated ischemia without evidence of inflammation. This experience suggests that the presence of an IUD might not be considered a contraindication for UAE.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Endometriose / Embolização da Artéria Uterina / Dispositivos Intrauterinos / Leiomioma Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Endometriose / Embolização da Artéria Uterina / Dispositivos Intrauterinos / Leiomioma Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article