Improved outcome of patients with low- and intermediate-risk cytogenetics acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse with gemtuzumab and cytarabine versus cytarabine: results of a retrospective comparative study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse is associated with a poor outcome even when treated with intermediate- to high-dose cytarabine (IHDAraC). Gemtuzumab ozogamycin (GO) used as a single agent has clinical activity in relapsed and refractory AML. Various combination regimens of GO have been developed, but few data are available regarding their efficacy compared with IHDAraC-based regimens. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of response and survival in 90 AML patients in first relapse treated with either IHDAraC (n = 56) or IHDAraC + GO (n = 34). Patient characteristics of the two groups were comparable. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 37 months. Compared with IHDAraC, IHDAraC + GO induction was associated with a better response rate (68% vs 45%, P = .04), a better overall survival (median, 35 months vs 6 months, P = .001), and a better event-free survival (24 months vs 6 months, P = .002). This effect was limited to patients with low-risk and intermediate-risk cytogenetics. In multivariate analysis, age, cytogenetic risk, first complete remission duration, and the use of IHDAraC + GO were independently associated with better results. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the addition of GO to IHDAraC is associated with a better efficacy for patients in first relapse of AML with low- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Prospective controlled studies of GO in this population are warranted. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics should be offered investigational new drugs.