Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of pain and functional impairment in the decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1909 patients. Report of the OARSI-OMERACT Task Force on total joint replacement.
Gossec, L; Paternotte, S; Maillefert, J F; Combescure, C; Conaghan, P G; Davis, A M; Gunther, K-P; Hawker, G; Hochberg, M; Katz, J N; Kloppenburg, M; Lim, K; Lohmander, L S; Mahomed, N N; March, L; Pavelka, K; Punzi, L; Roos, E M; Sanchez-Riera, L; Singh, J A; Suarez-Almazor, M E; Dougados, M.
Afiliação
  • Gossec L; Paris Descartes University, Medicine Faculty, APHP, Rheumatology B Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France. laure.gossec@cch.aphp.fr
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 19(2): 147-54, 2011 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21044689
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the pain and functional disability levels corresponding to an indication for total joint replacement (TJR) in hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN:

International cross-sectional study in 10 countries. PATIENTS Consecutive outpatients with definite hip or knee OA attending an orthopaedic outpatient clinic. Gold standard measure for recommendation for TJR Surgeon's decision that TJR is justified. OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Pain (ICOAP intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain, 0-100) and functional impairment (HOOS-PS/KOOS-PS Hip/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short-form, 0-100). ANALYSES Comparison of patients with vs without surgeons' indication for TJR. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and logistic regression were applied to determine cut points of pain and disability defining recommendation for TJR.

RESULTS:

In all, 1909 patients were included (1130 knee/779 hip OA). Mean age was 66.4 [standard deviation (SD) 10.9] years, 58.1% were women; 628/1130 (55.6%) knee OA and 574/779 (73.7%) hip OA patients were recommended for TJR. Although patients recommended for TJR (yes vs no) had worse symptom levels [pain, 55.5 (95% confidence interval 54.2, 56.8) vs. 44.9 (43.2, 46.6), and functional impairment, 59.8 (58.7, 60.9) vs. 50.9 (49.3, 52.4), respectively, both P<0.0001], there was substantial overlap in symptom levels between groups, even when adjusting for radiographic joint status. Thus, it was not possible to determine cut points for pain and function defining 'requirement for TJR'.

CONCLUSION:

Although symptom levels were higher in patients recommended for TJR, pain and functional disability alone did not discriminate between those who were and were not considered to need TJR by the orthopaedic surgeon.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Osteoartrite do Quadril / Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho / Osteoartrite do Joelho / Avaliação da Deficiência Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Osteoartrite do Quadril / Artroplastia de Quadril / Artroplastia do Joelho / Osteoartrite do Joelho / Avaliação da Deficiência Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article