Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following hysterectomy, vascular, and colorectal surgery.
Yokoe, Deborah S; Khan, Yosef; Olsen, Margaret A; Hooper, David C; Greenbaum, Maurice; Vostok, Johanna; Lankiewicz, Julie; Fraser, Victoria J; Stevenson, Kurt B.
Afiliação
  • Yokoe DS; Channing Laboratory and Infectious Diseases Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. dyokoe@partners.org
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(8): 768-73, 2012 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759543
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the use of inpatient pharmacy and administrative data to detect surgical site infections (SSIs) following hysterectomy and colorectal and vascular surgery.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Five hospitals affiliated with academic medical centers. PATIENTS Adults who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy, colorectal surgery, or vascular surgery procedures between July 1, 2003, and June 30, 2005.

METHODS:

We reviewed the medical records of weighted, random samples drawn from 3,079 abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy, 4,748 colorectal surgery, and 3,332 vascular surgery procedures. We compared routine surveillance with screening of inpatient pharmacy data and diagnosis codes and then performed medical record review to confirm SSI status.

RESULTS:

Medical records from 823 hysterectomy, 736 colorectal surgery, and 680 vascular surgery procedures were reviewed. SSI rates determined by antimicrobial- and/or diagnosis code-based screening followed by medical record review (enhanced surveillance) were substantially higher than rates determined by routine surveillance (4.3% [95% confidence interval, 3.6%-5.1%] vs 2.7% for hysterectomies, 7.1% [95% confidence interval, 6.7%-8.2%] vs 2.0% for colorectal procedures, and 2.3% [95% confidence interval, 1.9%-2.9%] vs 1.4% for vascular procedures). Enhanced surveillance had substantially higher sensitivity than did routine surveillance to detect SSI (92% vs 59% for hysterectomies, 88% vs 22% for colorectal procedures, and 72% vs 43% for vascular procedures). A review of medical records confirmed SSI for 31% of hysterectomies, 20% of colorectal procedures, and 31% of vascular procedures that met the enhanced screening criteria.

CONCLUSION:

Antimicrobial- and diagnosis code-based screening may be a useful method for enhancing and streamlining SSI surveillance for a variety of surgical procedures, including those procedures targeted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar / Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica / Prontuários Médicos / Classificação Internacional de Doenças / Vigilância da População Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar / Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica / Prontuários Médicos / Classificação Internacional de Doenças / Vigilância da População Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article