Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Increased adherence to prenatal group B streptococcal screening guidelines through a paired electronic reminder and education intervention.
MacLaughlin, Kathy L; Garrison, Gregory M; Matthews, Marc R; O'Brien, Marcia L; Westby, Elizabeth; Targonski, Paul V.
Afiliação
  • MacLaughlin KL; Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. maclaughlin.kathy@mayo.edu.
  • Garrison GM; Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Matthews MR; Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • O'Brien ML; Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Westby E; Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Targonski PV; Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(1): 16-21, 2014 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23417210
ABSTRACT
The 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) update on perinatal group B streptococcal (GBS) prevention advises universal vaginal-rectal GBS screening of pregnant women in the 35th through 37th week of gestation. Because GBS colonization is transient, a test performed more than 5 weeks before delivery may not have sufficient negative predictive value to be clinically useful. Our objective was to increase rates of quality-improved, CDC-adherent GBS screening and decrease repeat screening. A reminder for maternal vaginal-rectal GBS testing was added to the physicians' electronic ordering screen, and family medicine physicians and residents were educated about screening guidelines through standardized, in-person presentations. Retrospective chart review was performed before and after these interventions. Univariate or bivariate analysis was performed for demographic factors, timing of first screen, rates of CDC-adherent screening (the newly defined quality-improved screen and the usual screen), and rates of repeat and unnecessary screens. Multivariate analysis was performed with quality-improved and usual screening as dependent variables. Bivariate analysis showed that post-intervention rates of quality-improved screening increased from 30 to 62 % (P < .001), usual screening increased from 69 to 84 % (P = .005), and repeat GBS screening decreased from 20 to 8 % (P = .007). Multivariate analysis showed increased post-intervention odds of quality-improved screening [odds ratio (OR) 3.59; 95 % CI 2.07-6.34] and usual screening (OR 2.67; 95 % CI 1.40-5.25). Low-cost, reproducible quality improvement interventions (electronic order reminder, educational sessions) have the potential to increase guideline adherence for GBS screening in pregnant women and decrease repeat screening.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos de Família / Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez / Diagnóstico Pré-Natal / Infecções Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos de Família / Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez / Diagnóstico Pré-Natal / Infecções Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article