Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What do patients think about year-end resident continuity clinic handoffs? A qualitative study.
Pincavage, Amber T; Lee, Wei Wei; Beiting, Kimberly J; Arora, Vineet M.
Afiliação
  • Pincavage AT; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue MC 3051, L326, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. apincava@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
J Gen Intern Med ; 28(8): 999-1007, 2013 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23595932
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although Internal Medicine year-end resident clinic handoffs affect numerous patients, little research has described patients' perspectives of the experience.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe patients' perceptions of positive and negative experiences pertaining to the year-end clinic handoff; to rate patient satisfaction with aspects of the clinic handoff and identify whether or not patients could name their new physicians.

DESIGN:

Qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS:

High-risk patients who underwent a year-end clinic handoff in July 2011. MEASUREMENTS Three months post-handoff, telephone interviews were conducted with patients to elicit their perceptions of positive and negative experiences. An initial coding classification was developed and applied to transcripts. Patients were also asked to name their primary care physician (PCP) and rate their satisfaction with the handoff.

RESULTS:

In all, 103 telephone interviews were completed. Patient experiences regarding clinic handoffs were categorized into four themes (1) doctor-patient relationships (i.e. difficulty building rapport); (2) clinic logistics (i.e. difficulty rescheduling appointments); (3) process of the care transition (i.e. patient unaware transition occurred); and (4) patient safety-related issues (i.e. missed tests). Only 59 % of patients could correctly name their new PCP. Patients who reported that they were informed of the clinic transition by letter or by telephone call from their new PCP were more likely to correctly name them (65 % vs. 32 % p = 0.007), report that their new doctor assumed care for them immediately (81 % [68/84] vs. 53 % [10/19], p = 0.009) and report satisfaction with communication between their old and new doctors (80 % [67/84] vs. 58 % [11/19], p = 0.04). Patients reported positive experiences such as learning more about their new physician through personal sharing, which helped them build rapport. Patients who reported being aware of the medical education mission of the clinic tended to be more understanding of the handoff process.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients face unique challenges during year-end clinic handoffs and provide insights into areas of improvement for a patient-centered handoff.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Satisfação do Paciente / Pesquisa Qualitativa / Segurança do Paciente / Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Satisfação do Paciente / Pesquisa Qualitativa / Segurança do Paciente / Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article