Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival outcomes of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation for patients with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores.
Chok, Kenneth Sh; Chan, See Ching; Fung, James Yy; Cheung, Tan To; Chan, Albert Cy; Fan, Sheung Tat; Lo, Chung Mau.
Afiliação
  • Chok KSh; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China. seechingchan@gmail.com
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int ; 12(3): 256-62, 2013 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23742770
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Controversy exists over whether living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) should be offered to patients with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. This study tried to determine whether a high MELD score would result in inferior outcomes of right-lobe LDLT.

METHODS:

Among 411 consecutive patients who received right-lobe LDLT at our center, 143 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to their MELD scores a high-score group (MELD score ≥25; n=75) and a low-score group (MELD score <25; n=68). Their demographic data and perioperative conditions were compared. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors affecting patient survival.

RESULTS:

In the high-score group, more patients required preoperative intensive care unit admission (49.3% vs 2.9%; P<0.001), mechanical ventilation (21.3% vs 0%; P<0.001), or hemodialysis (13.3% vs 0%; P=0.005); the waiting time before LDLT was shorter (4 vs 66 days; P<0.001); more blood was transfused during operation (7 vs 2 units; P<0.001); patients stayed longer in the intensive care unit (6 vs 3 days; P<0.001) and hospital (21 vs 15 days; P=0.015) after transplantation; more patients developed early postoperative complications (69.3% vs 50.0%; P=0.018); and values of postoperative peak blood parameters were higher. However, the two groups had comparable hospital mortality. Graft survival and patient overall survival at one year (94.7% vs 95.6%; 95.9% vs 96.9%), three years (91.9% vs 92.6%; 93.2% vs 95.3%), and five years (90.2% vs 90.2%; 93.2% vs 95.3%) were also similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the high-score group had significantly more early postoperative complications, the two groups had comparable hospital mortality and similar satisfactory rates of graft survival and patient overall survival. Therefore, a high MELD score should not be a contraindication to right-lobe LDLT if donor risk and recipient benefit are taken into full account.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Doadores Vivos / Hepatopatias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Fígado / Doadores Vivos / Hepatopatias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article