Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neonatal blood pressure monitoring: visual assessment is an unreliable method for selecting cuff sizes.
Devinck, A; Keukelier, H; De Savoye, I; Desmet, L; Smets, K.
Afiliação
  • Devinck A; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Acta Paediatr ; 102(10): 961-4, 2013 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23799976
AIM: To compare current practice of cuff size selection for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in a single-centre, tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (visual assessment of bladder width/limb length closest to 2/3) with common recommendations for appropriate cuff selection. METHODS: Visual assessment of the appropriate cuff size ('2/3 rule') for upper arm, forearm and calf in 103 neonates (309 cuff selections) was compared with the following recommendations: (i) Method A - guidelines of the cuff manufacturer, (ii) Method B - cuff width/limb circumference ratio 0.44-0.60 and (iii) Method C - cuff width/limb length ratio closest to 0.66. RESULTS: The upper arm cuff size was correctly chosen in 84% of cases (Method A), 43% (Method B) and 56% (Method C). The forearm cuff size was correctly chosen in 94% of cases (Method A), 68% (Method B) and 54% (Method C). The calf cuff size was correctly chosen in 96% of cases (Method A), 72% (Method B) and 63% (Method C). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of selecting cuff size by visual assessment is low. Further research on accurate cuff selection for neonates, including at the forearm and calf, is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Intensiva Neonatal / Esfigmomanômetros Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Intensiva Neonatal / Esfigmomanômetros Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article