Neonatal blood pressure monitoring: visual assessment is an unreliable method for selecting cuff sizes.
Acta Paediatr
; 102(10): 961-4, 2013 Oct.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-23799976
AIM: To compare current practice of cuff size selection for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in a single-centre, tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (visual assessment of bladder width/limb length closest to 2/3) with common recommendations for appropriate cuff selection. METHODS: Visual assessment of the appropriate cuff size ('2/3 rule') for upper arm, forearm and calf in 103 neonates (309 cuff selections) was compared with the following recommendations: (i) Method A - guidelines of the cuff manufacturer, (ii) Method B - cuff width/limb circumference ratio 0.44-0.60 and (iii) Method C - cuff width/limb length ratio closest to 0.66. RESULTS: The upper arm cuff size was correctly chosen in 84% of cases (Method A), 43% (Method B) and 56% (Method C). The forearm cuff size was correctly chosen in 94% of cases (Method A), 68% (Method B) and 54% (Method C). The calf cuff size was correctly chosen in 96% of cases (Method A), 72% (Method B) and 63% (Method C). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of selecting cuff size by visual assessment is low. Further research on accurate cuff selection for neonates, including at the forearm and calf, is warranted.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Terapia Intensiva Neonatal
/
Esfigmomanômetros
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
Limite:
Humans
/
Newborn
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2013
Tipo de documento:
Article