Indicators of early and late processing reveal the importance of within-trial-time for theories of associative learning.
PLoS One
; 8(6): e66291, 2013.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-23826092
ABSTRACT
In four human learning experiments (Pavlovian skin conductance, causal learning, speeded classification task), we evaluated several associative learning theories that assume either an elemental (modified unique cue model and Harris' model) or a configural (Pearce's configural theory and an extension of it) form of stimulus processing. The experiments used two modified patterning problems (A/B/C+, AB/BC/AC+ vs. ABC-; A+, BC+ vs. ABC-). Pearce's configural theory successfully predicted all of our data reflecting early stimulus processing, while the predictions of the elemental theories were in accord with all of our data reflecting later stages of stimulus processing. Our results suggest that the form of stimulus representation depends on the amount of time available for stimulus processing. Our findings highlight the necessity to investigate stimulus processing during conditioning on a finer time scale than usually done in contemporary research.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Teoria Psicológica
/
Aprendizagem por Associação
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2013
Tipo de documento:
Article