Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antidepressant and group psychosocial treatment for depression: a rater blind exploratory RCT from a low income country.
Husain, Nusrat; Chaudhry, Nasim; Fatima, Batool; Husain, Meher; Amin, Rizwana; Chaudhry, Imran Bashir; Ur Rahman, Raza; Tomenson, Barbara; Jafri, Farhat; Naeem, Farooq; Creed, Francis.
Afiliação
  • Husain N; University of Manchester, andLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
  • Chaudhry N; University of Manchester,UK.
  • Fatima B; Pakistan Institute of Learning and Living,Pakistan, andBoston University,USA.
  • Husain M; Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
  • Amin R; Pakistan Institute of Learning and Living,Pakistan.
  • Chaudhry IB; Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, andUniversity of Manchester,UK.
  • Ur Rahman R; Dow University of Health Sciences,Karachi,Pakistan.
  • Tomenson B; University of Manchester,UK.
  • Jafri F; Karachi Medical and Dental College,Pakistan.
  • Naeem F; Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
  • Creed F; University of Manchester,UK.
Behav Cogn Psychother ; 42(6): 693-705, 2014 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23867053
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Research in the West shows that group psychological intervention together with an antidepressant treatment leads to more effective treatment of a depressive disorder. There are no treatment trials from low income countries comparing the efficacy of antidepressant treatment with a group psychological intervention.

AIM:

To conduct a feasibility trial to compare the efficacy of an antidepressant to a group psychosocial intervention, for low income women attending primary health care in Karachi, Pakistan.

METHOD:

This was a preliminary RCT in an urban primary health care clinic in Karachi, Pakistan. Consecutive eligible women scoring >12 on the CIS-R and >18 on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) (n = 66) were randomly assigned to antidepressants or a psychosocial treatment in group settings. The primary outcome measure was HDRS score; secondary outcome measures were disability and quality of life.

RESULTS:

More than half of the patients in both groups improved (50% reduction in HDRS scores); at end of therapy at 3 months 19 (59.4%) vs 18 (56.2%), and at 6-month follow-up 21(67.7%) vs 20(62.5%) for antidepressants and psychosocial intervention respectively. Although HDRS, BDQ and EQ5-D scores all improved considerably in both groups from start to end of treatment, and these improvements were largely maintained after a further 3 months, the differences between the two treatments were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION:

Psychosocial intervention was as effective as antidepressants in reducing depression and in improving quality of life and disability at the end of therapy. However, these findings need further exploration through a larger trial.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pobreza / Psicoterapia de Grupo / Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental / Fluoxetina / Países em Desenvolvimento / Antidepressivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pobreza / Psicoterapia de Grupo / Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental / Fluoxetina / Países em Desenvolvimento / Antidepressivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article