Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Referrals to phase I clinical trials in a gynecologic oncology unit.
Slaughter, Katrina N; Nugent, Elizabeth K; Bishop, Erin A; Perry, Latoya J; McMeekin, D Scott; Moore, Kathleen N.
Afiliação
  • Slaughter KN; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA. Electronic address: Katrina-slaughter@ouhsc.edu.
  • Nugent EK; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
  • Bishop EA; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
  • Perry LJ; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
  • McMeekin DS; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
  • Moore KN; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.
Gynecol Oncol ; 132(1): 231-5, 2014 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24041878
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Previous reviews of phase I clinical trials report limited response rates. Development of novel biologic agents and trials designs have increased these rates. A contemporary appraisal of phase I clinical trials in gynecologic malignancies could help validate these findings.

METHODS:

Retrospectively reviewed records for 410 patients with gynecologic malignancies treated in a phase I unit, January 1999 to October 2012. Patient characteristics and treatment outcomes were abstracted and analyzed.

RESULTS:

Patients enrolled in 43 different phase I trials, 17 phase Ia, 17 phase Ib dose escalation and 9 dose expansion. 9 trials (21%) investigated unique cytotoxic delivery methods, 15 (35%) conventional cytotoxic plus novel agents and 19 (44%) novel agents alone. For patients treated in the first-line setting, 90 (74.4%) achieved CR, 20 (16.5%) PR, 9 (7.4%) SD and 2 (1.7%) PD, yielding an overall response rate of 90.9%. In patients treated for recurrent disease, 2 (1.6%) achieved CR, 11 (8.9%) PR, 57 (46.0%) SD and 54 (43.5%) PD, yielding a response rate of 11% and an overall clinical benefit rate of 57%. Response rate for molecular targeted therapies was 11.5% with an overall clinical benefit rate of 46.2%. Patients with prior anti-angiogenic exposure had comparable median PFS to those who had not been previously exposed (3.5 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS:

Results support referral of gynecologic cancer patients for phase I clinical trials. Patients with advanced, heavily pretreated disease fare at least as well as they do on phase II trials and a proportion of them can attain an objective response or stabilization of their disease.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article