Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The addition of radiation to chemotherapy does not improve outcome when compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of resected pancreas cancer: the results of a single-institution experience.
Martin, Ludmila Katherine; Luu, Dai Chu; Li, Xiaobai; Muscarella, Peter; Ellison, E Christopher; Bloomston, Mark; Bekaii-Saab, Tanios.
Afiliação
  • Martin LK; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Luu DC; Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Li X; Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Muscarella P; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Ellison EC; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Bloomston M; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Bekaii-Saab T; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 21(3): 862-867, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24046122
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pancreas cancer is highly lethal even at early stages. Adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiation (CRT) is standard following surgery to delay recurrence and improve survival. There is no consensus on the added value of radiotherapy (RT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes in pancreas cancer patients treated with CT or CRT following surgery.

METHODS:

Patients with resected pancreas adenocarcinoma were identified in our institutional database. Relevant clinicopathologic and demographic data were collected. Patients were grouped according to adjuvant treatment group A no treatment; group B CT; group C CRT. The primary endpoint of overall survival was compared between groups B vs. C. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential prognostic factors were conducted including all patients.

RESULTS:

A total of 146 evaluable patients were included (group A n = 33; group B n = 45; group C n = 68). Demographics and pathologic characteristics were comparable. There was no significant survival benefit for CRT compared with CT (mOS 16.8 months vs. 21.5 months, respectively, p = 0.76). Local recurrence rates were similar in all three groups. Univariate analyses identified absence of lymph node involvement (hazards ratio [HR] 1.43, p = 0.0082) and administration of adjuvant therapy (HR 0.496, p = 0.0008) as significant predictors for improved survival. Multivariate analyses suggested that patients without nodal involvement derived the most benefit from adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

The addition of RT to CT did not improve survival over CT. Lymph node involvement predicts inferior clinical outcome.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia Adjuvante / Radioterapia Adjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia Adjuvante / Radioterapia Adjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article