Cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair.
Cir Esp
; 92(8): 553-60, 2014 Oct.
Article
em En, Es
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24054792
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic surgery is a successful treatment option offering significant advantages to patients compared with open ventral hernia repair. A cost-benefit analysis was performed to compare the clinical results and economic costs of the open and laparoscopic techniques for anterior abdominal wall hernia repair, in order to determine the more efficient procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 140 patients with primary and incisional hernia, and analyzed clinical data, morbidity, costs of surgery and hospital stay costs. RESULTS: The cost of disposable surgical supplies was higher with laparoscopic repair but reduced the average length of stay (P<.001) and patient morbidity (P<.001). The total cost of the laparoscopic procedure was, therefore, less than initially estimated, yielding a savings of 1,260 per patient (2,865 vs. 4,125). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is associated with a reduced complication rate, a lower average length of stay and with lower total costs. Laparoscopic repair can save 1.260 for each patient, and so this procedure should be considered a cost-effective approach.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Análise Custo-Benefício
/
Laparoscopia
/
Herniorrafia
/
Hérnia Ventral
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Health_economic_evaluation
/
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
/
Es
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Article