Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures.
Ivarsen, Anders; Asp, Sven; Hjortdal, Jesper.
Afiliação
  • Ivarsen A; Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: ai@dadlnet.dk.
  • Asp S; Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Hjortdal J; Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ophthalmology ; 121(4): 822-8, 2014 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24365175
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the safety and complications of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

DESIGN:

Clinical control cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 922 healthy patients (1800 eyes) who were treated for myopia or myopic astigmatism between January 2011 and March 2013 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus, Denmark.

METHODS:

Patients received a full preoperative examination and were treated with SMILE in both eyes and followed for 3 months (1574 eyes). Patients with complications, including loss of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) or dissatisfaction, were offered a late reexamination. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Surgical complications and CDVA.

RESULTS:

Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -7.25±1.84 diopters (D). Average postoperative refraction was -0.28±0.52 D, and mean error of treatment was -0.15±0.50 D. By 3 months, 86% (1346 eyes) had unchanged or improved CDVA. A loss of 2 or more lines was observed in 1.5% of eyes; however, at a late follow-up visit (average, 18 months), CDVA was within 1 line of the preoperative level in all eyes. Perioperative complications included epithelial abrasions (6%), small tears at the incision (1.8%), and difficult lenticule extraction (1.9%). The cap was perforated in 4 eyes, and a major tear occurred in 1 eye; however, none of these patients had late visual symptoms. In 0.8% (14 eyes), suction was lost during surgery. Re-treatment was successful in 13 eyes, whereas 1 eye had ghost images and was re-treated with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Postoperative complications included trace haze (8%), epithelial dryness on day 1 (5%), interface inflammation secondary to central abrasion (0.3%), and minor interface infiltrates (0.3%); these complications had an impact on CDVA at 3 months in only 1 case. Irregular corneal topography occurred in 1.0% of eyes, resulting in reduced 3-month CDVA (12 eyes) or ghost images (6 eyes). Topography-guided PRK was performed in 4 eyes, with improvement in 3 cases. Satisfaction was high, with only 2 patients dissatisfied at their latest visit because of blurred vision or residual astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, SMILE had acceptable safety. Although 1.5% of eyes had reduced CDVA by 3 months, visual acuity was restored in the long term. Likewise, patient satisfaction was high.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Astigmatismo / Substância Própria / Cirurgia da Córnea a Laser / Lasers de Excimer / Miopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Astigmatismo / Substância Própria / Cirurgia da Córnea a Laser / Lasers de Excimer / Miopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article