Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative proteome analysis revealing an 11-protein signature for aggressive triple-negative breast cancer.
Liu, Ning Qing; Stingl, Christoph; Look, Maxime P; Smid, Marcel; Braakman, René B H; De Marchi, Tommaso; Sieuwerts, Anieta M; Span, Paul N; Sweep, Fred C G J; Linderholm, Barbro K; Mangia, Anita; Paradiso, Angelo; Dirix, Luc Y; Van Laere, Steven J; Luider, Theo M; Martens, John W M; Foekens, John A; Umar, Arzu.
Afiliação
  • Liu NQ; Affiliations of authors: Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (NQL, MPL, MS, RBHB, TDM, AMS, JWMM, JAF, AU); Department of Neurology (CS, TML) and Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine (NQL, RBHB, TDM, AMS, JWMM, JAF, AU), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology (PNS) and Department of Laboratory Medicine (FCGJS), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; De
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 106(2): djt376, 2014 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24399849
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical outcome of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly variable. This study aims to identify and validate a prognostic protein signature for TNBC patients to reduce unnecessary adjuvant systemic therapy.

METHODS:

Frozen primary tumors were collected from 126 lymph node-negative and adjuvant therapy-naive TNBC patients. These samples were used for global proteome profiling in two series an in-house training (n = 63) and a multicenter test (n = 63) set. Patients who remained free of distant metastasis for a minimum of 5 years after surgery were defined as having good prognosis. Cox regression analysis was performed to develop a prognostic signature, which was independently validated. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS:

An 11-protein signature was developed in the training set (median follow-up for good-prognosis patients = 117 months) and subsequently validated in the test set (median follow-up for good-prognosis patients = 108 months) showing 89.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69.2% to 98.1%), 70.5% specificity (95% CI = 61.7% to 74.2%), 56.7% positive predictive value (95% CI = 43.8% to 62.1%), and 93.9% negative predictive value (95% CI = 82.3% to 98.9%) for poor-prognosis patients. The predicted poor-prognosis patients had higher risk to develop distant metastasis than the predicted good-prognosis patients in univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 13.15; 95% CI = 3.03 to 57.07; P = .001) and multivariable (HR = 12.45; 95% CI = 2.67 to 58.11; P = .001) analysis. Furthermore, the predicted poor-prognosis group had statistically significantly more breast cancer-specific mortality. Using our signature as guidance, more than 60% of patients would have been exempted from unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy compared with conventional prognostic guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS:

We report the first validated proteomic signature to assess the natural course of clinical TNBC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica / Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos / Proteoma / Perfilação da Expressão Gênica / Transcriptoma / Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica / Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos / Proteoma / Perfilação da Expressão Gênica / Transcriptoma / Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article