Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival in elderly patients supported with continuous flow left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplantation or destination therapy.
Rosenbaum, Andrew N; John, Ranjit; Liao, Kenneth K; Adatya, Sirtaz; Colvin-Adams, Monica M; Pritzker, Marc; Eckman, Peter M.
Afiliação
  • Rosenbaum AN; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • John R; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Liao KK; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Adatya S; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Colvin-Adams MM; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Pritzker M; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Eckman PM; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: eckmanp@umn.edu.
J Card Fail ; 20(3): 161-7, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24412524
BACKGROUND: Published data on mechanical circulatory support for elderly patients in continuous flow devices are sparse and suggest relatively poor survival. This study investigated whether LVADs can be implanted in selected patients over the age of 65 years with acceptable survival compared with published outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in 64 consecutive patients ≥65 years of age implanted with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) as either bridge to transplantation or destination therapy from August 2005 to January 2012. Baseline laboratory and hemodynamic characteristics and follow-up data were obtained. Median survival was 1,090 days. Survival was 85%, 74%, 55%, and 45% at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Our cohort had a baseline mean Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) score of 2.6 ± 0.9. Observed survival was significantly better than SHFM-predicted medical survival. Stratification by age subsets, renal function, SHFM, implantation intention, or etiology did not reveal significant differences in survival. The most common cause of death was sepsis and nonlethalcomplication was bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with patients over the age of 65 receiving CF-LVADs suggests that this group demonstrates excellent survival. Further research is needed to discern the specific criteria for risk stratification for LVAD support in the elderly.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Transplante de Coração / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Transplante de Coração / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article