Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Surgical options and clinical outcomes in patients of lumbar disc herniation with Modic changes].
Zhao, Dong; Deng, Shu-cai; Ma, Yi; Hao, Yong-hong; Jia, Zhan-hua; Zhao, He-yuan.
Afiliação
  • Zhao D; Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China. Email: doczhaodong@yahoo.com.cn.
  • Deng SC; Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
  • Ma Y; Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
  • Hao YH; Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
  • Jia ZH; Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
  • Zhao HY; Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 93(39): 3111-5, 2013 Oct 22.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24417988
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To retrospectively evaluate medium and long-term outcomes of conventional fenestration discectomy versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar disc herniation with Modic changes.

METHODS:

From January 2002 to January 2007, a total of 486 patients of lumbar disc herniation with Modic changes were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into fenestration group (n = 215) and fusion group (n = 271) according to the operative approaches. The scores of Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) pre-and post-operative 3, 6, 12 month and annually were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS:

All of them had complete records during a mean follow-up period of 88.9 (60-120) months. At the end of the latest follow-up, all symptoms were relieved postoperatively. Significantly difference existed in the improvement rate of back pain VAS between two groups (77.9% vs 68.0%). In the fenestration group, the improvement rate of VAS (back pain) of Modic type I I was better than that of Modic type I (72.8% vs 64.9%). And the difference was statistically significant. For those with Modic type I changes, the improvement rate of ODI and VAS (back pain) of the fusion group were better than those of the fenestration group (78.3% vs 70.4% and 77.4% vs 64.9%). And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The patients with Modic I and II changes were recommended to undergo lumbar fusion and undergo fenestration discectomy respectively.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Discotomia / Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Discotomia / Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article