Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.
Chen, Moon S; Lara, Primo N; Dang, Julie H T; Paterniti, Debora A; Kelly, Karen.
Afiliação
  • Chen MS; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California; Cancer Control, University of California, Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
Cancer ; 120 Suppl 7: 1091-6, 2014 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24643646
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993 mandated the appropriate inclusion of minorities in all NIH-funded research. Twenty years after this act, the proportion of minority patients enrolled in cancer clinical trials remains persistently low. Clinical trials are vehicles for the development and evaluation of therapeutic and preventive agents under scientifically rigorous conditions. Without representation in trials, it is projected that disparities in the cancer burden for minorities will increase.

METHODS:

For this review article, the authors counted the frequency with which minorities were the primary focus of National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials, examined citations from the PubMed database focusing on the search terms "NIH Revitalization Act of 1993" and "enhancing minority accrual to cancer clinical trials," and supplemented the review with their expertise in NIH-funded research related to minority accrual in cancer clinical trials.

RESULTS:

The reporting and analyses of data based on minorities in clinical trials remain inadequate. Less than 2% of the National Cancer Institute's clinical trials focus on any racial/minority population as their primary emphasis. The current review of the literature indicated that the percentage of authors who reported their study sample by race/ethnicity ranged from 1.5% to 58%, and only 20% of the randomized controlled studies published in a high-impact oncology journal reported analyzing results by race/ethnicity. Proportionately greater population increases in minorities, accompanied by their persistent and disproportionate cancer burden, reinforce the need for their greater representation in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS:

Renewing the emphasis for minority participation in clinical trials is warranted. Policy changes are recommended.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Seleção de Pacientes / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde / Grupos Minoritários / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Seleção de Pacientes / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde / Grupos Minoritários / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article