Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Infection rate of emergency bolt-kit vs. non-emergency conventional implanted silver bearing external ventricular drainage catheters.
Fichtner, Jens; Jilch, Astrid; Stieglitz, Lennart Henning; Beck, Jürgen; Raabe, Andreas; Z' Graggen, Werner J.
Afiliação
  • Fichtner J; Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern 3010 Switzerland.
  • Jilch A; Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern 3010 Switzerland.
  • Stieglitz LH; Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern 3010 Switzerland.
  • Beck J; Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern 3010 Switzerland.
  • Raabe A; Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern 3010 Switzerland.
  • Z' Graggen WJ; Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern 3010 Switzerland. Electronic address: Werner.ZGraggen@insel.ch.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 122: 70-6, 2014 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24908221
BACKGROUND: Bolt-kit systems are increasingly used as an alternative to conventional external cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage systems. Since 2009 we regularly utilize bolt-kit external ventricular drainage (EVD) systems with silver-bearing catheters inserted manually with a hand drill and skull screws for emergency ventriculostomy. For non-emergency situations, we use conventional ventriculostomy with subcutaneous tunneled silver-bearing catheters, performed in the operating room with a pneumatic drill. This retrospective analysis compared the two techniques in terms of infection rates. METHODS: 152 patients (aged 17-85 years, mean=55.4 years) were included in the final analysis; 95 received bolt-kit silver-bearing catheters and 57 received conventionally implanted silver-bearing catheters. The primary endpoint combined infection parameters: occurrence of positive CSF culture, colonization of catheter tips, or elevated CSF white blood cell counts (>4/µl). Secondary outcome parameters were presence of microorganisms in CSF or on catheter tips. Incidence of increased CSF cell counts and number of patients with catheter malposition were also compared. RESULTS: The primary outcome, defined as analysis of combined infection parameters (occurrence of either positive CSF culture, colonization of the catheter tips or raised CSF white blood cell counts >4/µl)was not significantly different between the groups (58.9% bolt-kit group vs. 63.2% conventionally implanted group, p=0.61, chi-square-test). The bolt-kit group was non-inferior and not superior to the conventional group (relative risk reduction of 6.7%; 90% confidence interval: -19.9% to 25.6%). Secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of microorganisms in CSF (2.1% bolt-kit vs. 5.3% conventionally implanted; p=0.30; chi-square-test). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates that silver-bearing EVD catheters implanted with a bolt-kit system outside the operating room do not significantly elevate the risk of CSF infection as compared to conventional implant methods.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ventriculostomia / Cateteres de Demora / Drenagem / Infecções Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ventriculostomia / Cateteres de Demora / Drenagem / Infecções Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article