Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Two-year clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing two interspinous spacers for treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis.
Patel, Vikas V; Whang, Peter G; Haley, Thomas R; Bradley, W Daniel; Nunley, Pierce D; Miller, Larry E; Block, Jon E; Geisler, Fred H.
Afiliação
  • Block JE; The Jon Block Group, 2210 Jackson Street, Suite 401, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA. jonblock@jonblockgroup.com.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 15: 221, 2014 Jul 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24996648
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Interspinous spacers are a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) unresponsive to conservative care. The purpose of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was to compare 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with moderate LSS treated with the Superion(®) (Experimental) or the X-Stop(®), a FDA-approved interspinous spacer (Control).

METHODS:

A total of 250 patients with moderate LSS unresponsive to conservative care were randomly allocated to treatment with the Experimental (n = 123) or Control (n = 127) interspinous spacer and followed through 2 years post-treatment. Complication data were available for all patients and patient-reported outcomes were available for 192 patients (101 Experimental, 91 Control) at 2 years.

RESULTS:

Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Symptom Severity and Physical Function scores improved 34% to 36% in both groups through 2 years (all p < 0.001). Patient Satisfaction scores at 2 years were 1.8 ± 0.9 with Experimental and 1.6 ± 0.8 with Control. Axial pain decreased from 59 ± 26 mm at baseline to 21 ± 26 mm at 2 years with Experimental and from 55 ± 26 mm to 21 ± 25 mm with Control (both p < 0.001). Extremity pain decreased from 67 ± 24 mm to 14 ± 22 mm at 2 years with Experimental and from 63 ± 24 mm to 18 ± 23 mm with Control (both p < 0.001). Back function assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index similarly improved with Experimental (37 ± 12% to 18 ± 16%) and Control (39 ± 12% to 20 ± 16%) (both p < 0.001). Freedom from reoperation at the index level was 84% for Experimental and 83% for Control (log-rank p = 0.38) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both interspinous spacers effectively alleviated pain and improved back function to a similar degree through 2 years in patients with moderate LSS who were unresponsive to conservative care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00692276.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article