Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sonographic Weight Estimation in Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
Dammer, U; Raabe, E; Kehl, S; Schmid, M; Mayr, A; Schild, R L; Beckmann, M W; Faschingbauer, F.
Afiliação
  • Dammer U; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Raabe E; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Kehl S; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Schmid M; Institute of Medical Biometrics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany.
  • Mayr A; Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Schild RL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonie Hospitals, Hannover, Germany.
  • Beckmann MW; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Faschingbauer F; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Ultraschall Med ; 36(6): 630-6, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25014478
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation (WE) for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses, and to further differentiate the evaluation between symmetric and asymmetric SGA fetuses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of WE in SGA fetuses (n = 898) was evaluated using 14 sonographic models and was further differentiated between symmetric (n = 750) and asymmetric (n = 148) SGA fetuses. SGA fetuses were considered to be asymmetric with a head circumference to abdominal circumference ratio above the 95th percentile. The accuracy of the different formulas was compared using means of percentage errors (MPE), medians of absolute percentage errors (MAPE), and proportions of estimates within 10 % of actual birth weight. RESULTS: RESULTS for the subgroup of asymmetric SGA fetuses differed significantly from the subgroup of symmetric SGA fetuses. MPE values were closer to zero with most of the formulas in the asymmetric SGA group. Apart from the Siemer, Shepard, Merz and Warsof equations, all formulas showed an underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric SGA fetuses. In contrast, in the symmetric SGA group, all of the formulas commonly used for fetuses in a normal weight range showed a systematic overestimation of fetal weight. Overall the best accuracy was achieved by using the Sabbagha equation (MPE 1.7 %; SD 9.0 %; MAPE: 6.0). CONCLUSION: An accurate WE in SGA fetuses is feasible using the Sabbagha formula. However, one has to be aware of the significant differences in WE between symmetric and asymmetric SGA fetuses.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional / Peso Fetal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional / Peso Fetal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article