Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between parallel transfer matrix method and admittance sum method.
Verdière, Kévin; Panneton, Raymond; Elkoun, Saïd; Dupont, Thomas; Leclaire, Philippe.
Afiliação
  • Verdière K; GAUS, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke (Qc), J1K 2R1, Canada Kevin.Verdiere@USherbrooke.ca, Raymond.Panneton@USherbrooke.ca, Said.Elkoun@USherbrooke.ca.
  • Panneton R; GAUS, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke (Qc), J1K 2R1, Canada Kevin.Verdiere@USherbrooke.ca, Raymond.Panneton@USherbrooke.ca, Said.Elkoun@USherbrooke.ca.
  • Elkoun S; GAUS, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke (Qc), J1K 2R1, Canada Kevin.Verdiere@USherbrooke.ca, Raymond.Panneton@USherbrooke.ca, Said.Elkoun@USherbrooke.ca.
  • Dupont T; DRIVE, ISAT, Université de Bourgogne, 49 Rue Mademoiselle Bourgeois, 58027 Nevers Cedex, France Thomas.Dupont@u-bourgogne.fr, Philippe.Leclaire_isat@u-bourgogne.fr.
  • Leclaire P; DRIVE, ISAT, Université de Bourgogne, 49 Rue Mademoiselle Bourgeois, 58027 Nevers Cedex, France Thomas.Dupont@u-bourgogne.fr, Philippe.Leclaire_isat@u-bourgogne.fr.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 136(2): EL90-5, 2014 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25096152
ABSTRACT
A transfer matrix method to predict absorption coefficient and transmission loss of parallel assemblies of materials which can be expressed by a 2 × 2 transfer matrix was published recently. However, the usual method based on the sum of admittances is largely used to predict also surface admittance of parallel assemblies. This paper aims to highlight differences between both methods through three examples on a parallel assembly backed by (1) a rigid wall, (2) an air cavity, and (3) an anechoic termination.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article