Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The lag time in initiating clinical testing of new drugs in combination with radiation therapy, a significant barrier to progress?
Blumenfeld, P; Pfeffer, R M; Symon, Z; Den, R B; Dicker, A P; Raben, D; Lawrence, Y R.
Afiliação
  • Blumenfeld P; 1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA [2] Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Pfeffer RM; 1] Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel [2] Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel [3] MSR School of Radiotherapy, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Symon Z; 1] Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel [2] Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel [3] MSR School of Radiotherapy, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Den RB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Dicker AP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Raben D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
  • Lawrence YR; 1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel [2] MSR School of Radiotherapy, Ramat Gan, Israel [3] Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Br J Cancer ; 111(7): 1305-9, 2014 Sep 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25117813
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The clinical development of new drugs with radiation appears to be limited. We hypothesised that phase I clinical trials with radiation therapy (RT) are initiated too late into a new drug's lifetime, impeding the ability to complete RT-drug development programmes before patent expiration.

METHODS:

We identified novel drug-radiation phase I combination trials performed between 1980 and 2012 within the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Data gathered for each drug included date the initial phase I trial with/without RT was opened/published, date of the published positive phase III trials, and patent expiration dates. Lag time was defined as the interval between opening of the phase I trial without RT and the opening of the phase I with RT. Linear regression was used to model how the lag time has changed over time.

RESULTS:

The median lag time was 6 years. The initial phase I trial with RT was typically published 2 years after the first published positive phase III trial and 11 years before patent expiration. Using a best-fit linear model, lag time decreased from 10 years for phase I trials published in 1990 to 5 years in 2005 (slope significantly non-zero, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinical drug development with RT commences late in the life cycle of anti-cancer agents. Taking into account the additional time required for late-phase clinical trials, the delay in initiating clinical testing of drug-RT combinations discourages drug companies from further pursuing RT-based development. Encouragingly, lag time appears to be decreasing. Further reduction in lag time may accelerate RT-based drug development, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimiorradioterapia / Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quimiorradioterapia / Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article