Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of open suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic assessment of risk for neurologic injury.
Sethi, Paul M; Vadasdi, Katherine; Greene, R Timothy; Vitale, Mark A; Duong, Michelle; Miller, Seth R.
Afiliação
  • Sethi PM; The ONS Foundation for Clinical Research and Education, Greenwich, CT, USA. Electronic address: sethi@onsmd.com.
  • Vadasdi K; The ONS Foundation for Clinical Research and Education, Greenwich, CT, USA.
  • Greene RT; The ONS Foundation for Clinical Research and Education, Greenwich, CT, USA.
  • Vitale MA; The ONS Foundation for Clinical Research and Education, Greenwich, CT, USA.
  • Duong M; The ONS Foundation for Clinical Research and Education, Greenwich, CT, USA.
  • Miller SR; The ONS Foundation for Clinical Research and Education, Greenwich, CT, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 24(1): 138-42, 2015 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25193486
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Surgical techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis that include penetration of the posterior humeral cortex for fixation may pose risk to the surrounding neurovascular structures.

HYPOTHESIS:

The risk of neurologic injury with techniques that involve penetration of the posterior humeral cortex for fixation in proximal biceps tenodesis will increase as the tenodesis site moves proximally from the subpectoral to the suprapectoral location.

METHODS:

Proximal biceps tenodesis was performed on 10 cadaveric upper extremities with 3 separate techniques. The proximity of the hardware to the relevant neurovascular structures was measured. The distances between the tenodesis site and the relevant neurovascular structures were measured.

RESULTS:

The guide pin was in direct contact with the axillary nerve in 20% of the suprapectoral tenodeses. The distance between the axillary nerve and the tenodesis site was 10.5 ± 5.5 mm for the suprapectoral location, 36.7 ± 11.2 mm in the subpectoral scenario, and 24.1 ± 11.2 mm in the 30° cephalad scenario (P = .003). The distance between the radial nerve and the anterior tenodesis site was 41.3 ± 9.3 mm for the suprapectoral location and 48.0 ± 10.7 mm for the subpectoral location. The distance of the musculocutaneous nerve from the tenodesis site was 28.4 ± 9.2 mm for the suprapectoral location and 37.4 ± 11.2 mm for the subpectoral location.

CONCLUSION:

In a cadaveric model of open biceps tenodesis, penetration of the posterior humeral cortex at the suprapectoral location results in proximity to the axillary nerve and should be avoided. Subpectoral bicortical button fixation drilled perpendicular to the axis of the humerus was a uniformly safe location with respect to the axillary nerve.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Tenodese / Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos / Úmero Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Tenodese / Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos / Úmero Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article