Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Logistic regression model for diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer on multi-parametric MRI.
Dikaios, Nikolaos; Alkalbani, Jokha; Sidhu, Harbir Singh; Fujiwara, Taiki; Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed; Kirkham, Alex; Allen, Clare; Ahmed, Hashim; Emberton, Mark; Freeman, Alex; Halligan, Steve; Taylor, Stuart; Atkinson, David; Punwani, Shonit.
Afiliação
  • Dikaios N; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 3rd Floor East Wing, 250 Euston Road, London, UK, NW1 2PG.
Eur Radiol ; 25(2): 523-32, 2015 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25226842
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to develop logistic regression (LR) models for classifying prostate cancer within the transition zone on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI).

METHODS:

One hundred and fifty-five patients (training cohort, 70 patients; temporal validation cohort, 85 patients) underwent mp-MRI and transperineal-template-prostate-mapping (TPM) biopsy. Positive cores were classified by cancer definitions (1) any-cancer; (2) definition-1 [≥Gleason 4 + 3 or ≥ 6 mm cancer core length (CCL)] [high risk significant]; and (3) definition-2 (≥Gleason 3 + 4 or ≥ 4 mm CCL) cancer [intermediate-high risk significant]. For each, logistic-regression mp-MRI models were derived from the training cohort and validated internally and with the temporal cohort. Sensitivity/specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC) curve were calculated. LR model performance was compared to radiologists' performance.

RESULTS:

Twenty-eight of 70 patients from the training cohort, and 25/85 patients from the temporal validation cohort had significant cancer on TPM. The ROC-AUC of the LR model for classification of cancer was 0.73/0.67 at internal/temporal validation. The radiologist A/B ROC-AUC was 0.65/0.74 (temporal cohort). For patients scored by radiologists as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (Pi-RADS) score 3, sensitivity/specificity of radiologist A 'best guess' and LR model was 0.14/0.54 and 0.71/0.61, respectively; and radiologist B 'best guess' and LR model was 0.40/0.34 and 0.50/0.76, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

LR models can improve classification of Pi-RADS score 3 lesions similar to experienced radiologists. KEY POINTS • MRI helps find prostate cancer in the anterior of the gland • Logistic regression models based on mp-MRI can classify prostate cancer • Computers can help confirm cancer in areas doctors are uncertain about.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Modelos Logísticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Modelos Logísticos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article