Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of oral liposomal iron versus intravenous iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in CKD patients: a randomized trial.
Pisani, Antonio; Riccio, Eleonora; Sabbatini, Massimo; Andreucci, Michele; Del Rio, Antonio; Visciano, Bianca.
Afiliação
  • Pisani A; Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • Riccio E; Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • Sabbatini M; Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • Andreucci M; Department of Nephrology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Del Rio A; Department of Biochemistry and Medical Technology, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • Visciano B; Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 30(4): 645-52, 2015 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25395392
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Iron deficiency is a common cause of anaemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD). Controversies exist about the optimal route of administration for iron therapy. Liposomal iron, a new generation oral iron with high gastrointestinal absorption and bioavailability and a low incidence of side effects, seems to be a promising new strategy of iron replacement. Therefore, we conducted a study to determine whether liposomal iron, compared with intravenous (IV) iron, improves anaemia in ND-CKD patients.

METHODS:

In this randomized, open-label trial, 99 patients with CKD (stage 3-5, not on dialysis) and iron deficiency anaemia [haemoglobin (Hb) ≤12 g/dL, ferritin ≤100 ng/mL, transferrin saturation ≤25%] were assigned (21) to receive oral liposomal iron (30 mg/day, Group OS) or a total dose of 1000 mg of IV iron gluconate (125 mg infused weekly) (Group IV) for 3 months. The patients were followed-up for the treatment period and 1 month after drug withdrawal. The primary end point was to evaluate the effects of the two treatments on Hb levels; the iron status, compliance and adverse effects were also evaluated.

RESULTS:

The short-term therapy with IV iron produced a more rapid Hb increase compared with liposomal iron, although the final increase in Hb was similar with either treatment; the difference between the groups was statistically significant at the first month and such difference disappeared at the end of treatment. After iron withdrawal, Hb concentrations remained stable in Group IV, while recovered to baseline in the OS group. The replenishment of iron stores was greater in the IV group. The incidence of adverse event was significantly lower in the oral group (P < 0.001), and the adherence was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study shows that oral liposomal iron is a safe and efficacious alternative to IV iron gluconate to correct anaemia in ND-CKD patients, although its effects on repletion of iron stores and on stability of Hb after drug discontinuation are lower.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Ferro / Anemia Ferropriva / Insuficiência Renal Crônica / Gluconatos / Lipossomos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Ferro / Anemia Ferropriva / Insuficiência Renal Crônica / Gluconatos / Lipossomos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article