Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana; Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A B; Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino; Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina; de Uzeda, Marcelo José P G; Granjeiro, José Mauro.
Afiliação
  • Calasans-Maia MD; Dental Clinical Research Center, Oral Surgery Department, Dentistry School, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
  • Mourão CF; Dentistry School, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
  • Alves AT; Dentistry School, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
  • Sartoretto SC; Dentistry School, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
  • de Uzeda MJ; Dentistry School, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
  • Granjeiro JM; Dentistry School, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 17 Suppl 2: e586-93, 2015 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25535980
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Insufficient residual alveolar bone height is a common deterrent in the placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The use of autografts, xenografts, allografts and alloplasts or a combination between them has been demonstrated to be effective for increasing bone height and bone volume in the deficient posterior maxilla.

PURPOSE:

The aim of this clinical trial is to comparatively determine the density of newly formed in sinus floor augmentation bone after a 24-week healing period treatment with a new bovine xenograft. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The sinus floor was grafted with Bio-Oss® (n = 10) and Osseous® (n = 10). Histological sections were examined with a focus on the presence of connective tissue (CT) and newly formed bone (NFB). The sections were histomorphometrically evaluated and the definitive crown was inserted after 3 months.

RESULTS:

After 6 months, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.60 (±2.503), the CT was 42.60 (±4.006) and the remaining biomaterial was 25.40 (±2.547) in Bio-Oss group. In Osseous group, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.90 (±3.542), the CT was 45.70 (±7.040) and the remaining biomaterial was 22.90 (±3.247).

CONCLUSIONS:

Both biomaterials afforded a favorable implant position and the prosthetic rehabilitation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substitutos Ósseos / Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar / Minerais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substitutos Ósseos / Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar / Minerais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article