Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of somatic mutl homolog 1 promoter hypermethylation in Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer.
Moreira, Leticia; Muñoz, Jenifer; Cuatrecasas, Míriam; Quintanilla, Isabel; Leoz, Maria Liz; Carballal, Sabela; Ocaña, Teresa; López-Cerón, María; Pellise, Maria; Castellví-Bel, Sergi; Jover, Rodrigo; Andreu, Montserrat; Carracedo, Angel; Xicola, Rosa Maria; Llor, Xavier; Boland, Clement Richard; Goel, Ajay; Castells, Antoni; Balaguer, Francesc.
Afiliação
  • Moreira L; Department of Gastroenterology, Barcelona Hospital Clinic, Networked Biomedical Research Center on Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Cancer ; 121(9): 1395-404, 2015 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25557234
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers (CRCs) that have microsatellite instability (MSI) and mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) immunoloss are observed in 3 clinical scenarios: Lynch syndrome (LS), sporadic MSI CRC, and Lynch-like syndrome (LLS). v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutational analysis is used to differentiate LS from sporadic MSI CRC. The role of MLH1 promoter methylation status for the differential diagnosis of these clinical forms is not well established. The objectives of this study were: 1) to analyze MLH1 promoter methylation in MLH1-deficient CRCs by pyrosequencing, and 2) to assess its role in the differential diagnosis of MLH1-deficient CRCs. METHODS: In total, 165 CRCs were analyzed, including LS (n = 19), MSI BRAF-mutated CRC (n = 37), MSI BRAF wild-type CRC (n = 60), and a control group of CRCs without MSI (microsatellite stable [MSS] CRC; n = 49). MLH1 promoter methylation status was analyzed by pyrosequencing, and the ability of different strategies to identify LS was assessed. RESULTS: The average ± standard deviation methylation in LS (9% ± 7%) was significantly lower than that in MSI BRAF-mutated CRC (42% ± 17%; P < .001) and in MSI BRAF wild-type CRC (25% ± 19%; P = .002). Somatic MLH1 hypermethylation was detected in 3 patients (15.8%) with LS, in 34 patients (91.9%) with MSI BRAF-mutated CRC, and in 37 patients (61.7%) with MSI BRAF wild-type tumors. Patients with MSI BRAF wild-type, unmethylated tumors (ie, LLS) had a stronger family history of CRC than those who had tumors with MLH1 methylation (P < .05). The sensitivity for ruling out LS was 100% for BRAF analysis, 84.2% for MLH1 methylation analysis, and 84.2% for the combination of both analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic MLH1 promoter methylation occurs in up to 15% of LS CRCs. Somatic BRAF analysis is the most sensitive strategy for ruling out LS. Patients who have CRCs with loss of MLH1 protein expression and neither BRAF mutation nor MLH1 methylation resemble patients with LS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Nucleares / Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose / Regiões Promotoras Genéticas / Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Nucleares / Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose / Regiões Promotoras Genéticas / Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article