Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Midterm results of David V valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A aortic dissection.
Leshnower, Bradley G; Myung, Richard J; McPherson, LaRonica; Chen, Edward P.
Afiliação
  • Leshnower BG; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Myung RJ; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • McPherson L; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Chen EP; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: edward.p.chen@emory.edu.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 99(3): 795-800; discussion 800-1, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25583463
BACKGROUND: The David V valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David V) has been shown to provide excellent long-term valve function and low rates of valve-related complications in the elective treatment of aortic root aneurysms. The safety and durability of the David V in the repair of acute type A aortic dissection (type A) are currently unclear. In this study, the midterm results of David V in the setting of type A aortic dissection were analyzed. METHODS: From 2005 to 2013, 350 patients underwent surgical repair of type A aortic dissection. Outcomes were analyzed in 43 consecutive patients who received a David V during repair of type A aortic dissection. Patients were followed with annual postoperative echocardiograms. Follow-up was 85% complete, with a mean duration of 40 ± 31 months. RESULTS: The mean age of these patients was 46 ± 10 years. There were two operative deaths (4.7%), and 93% of patients required a hemiarch replacement (n = 32) or a total arch replacement (n = 8) using hypothermic circulatory arrest. Cusp repairs were performed in 6 (14%) patients; 51% of patients had 3+ or greater preoperative aortic insufficiency (AI), 83% of patients left the operating room with zero AI, and the remainder had 1+ AI or less. No patient in the follow-up period developed endocarditis or required aortic valve replacement. At midterm follow-up, freedom from 2+ AI was 94%, and freedom from aortic valve replacement was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The David V can be performed with low morbidity and mortality in young patients presenting with type A aortic dissection who require aortic root replacement. At midterm follow-up, valve function is durable, and the incidence of valve-related complications is low.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão / Dissecção Aórtica Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão / Dissecção Aórtica Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article